The Universe reveals striking mathematical beauty — extraordinary equations. This leads to the notion that if there were no matter, they would still exist as an ideal entity, and therefore, they might have a purpose: "the universe, with their help, creates intelligent worlds." But the paradox is that if there is no matter, then there is no this beauty, which exists only due to the presence of matter. And the fact that they are so incredible is due to the whimsicality of the physical world, without which they, as a descriptive language, would not be such, and there would not be us and these questions. They are, as they say in the language of science, supervenient phenomena, but not miracles.
Mathematics does not exist in the Universe as the substance of creation; it exists as a language for describing natural phenomena, playing an informative and descriptive role for us. The magnificence of its equations depends on the whimsicality of the physical world, without which the equations would not be so elegant, and we would not exist.
Is the statement true: "Events occurring in the Universe concerning the human race are random and chaotic, for humanity might not have arisen, and there's a significant chance of our species going extinct due to natural causes"?
If we assume that the Universe has a purpose, an immediate question arises: who or what set this purpose, and when and how was it done? However, if the answer suggests that the purpose inherently exists without conscious intent, then it's more apt to call it not a purpose but a property — more precisely, a purposeless and uncaused property.
