The universe demonstrates striking mathematical elegance in wondrous equations, and the thought arises that even if there were no matter, these equations would still exist, as the ideal being, which means they have a purpose: the universe, with their help creates intelligent worlds. But the paradox is that if there were no matter, then there would be no such beauty — they only exist due to the presence of matter. The fact that they are so incredible — it's simply their property, and if they were not like this, there would be no us or these questions. They are, as they say in the language of science — supervenient phenomena, not miracles.
Mathematics does not exist in the Universe as the substance of creation; it exists as a language for describing natural phenomena, playing an informative and descriptive role for us. The magnificence of its equations depends on the whimsicality of the physical world, without which the equations would not be so elegant, and we would not exist.
Is the statement true: "Events occurring in the Universe concerning the human race are random and chaotic, for humanity might not have arisen, and there's a significant chance of our species going extinct due to natural causes"?
If we assume that the Universe has a purpose, an immediate question arises: who or what set this purpose, and when and how was it done? However, if the answer suggests that the purpose inherently exists without conscious intent, then it's more apt to call it not a purpose but a property — more precisely, a purposeless and uncaused property.
